Chrysler LLC said Tuesday it will put an electric car on sale in North America in 2010.
- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (15)
The company showed reporters three electric prototypes: a Dodge sports car, a Jeep and a Chrysler minivan. But the automaker's product development chief, Frank Klegon, said the company hasn't decided which vehicle will come out in 2010.
If they' possibly can, all three.
- 3 votes
I believe the best way an electric car could be designed is with an easily removable gasoline engine. This would take the form of two two cylinder engine components with built in generators and a removable gas tank. All components would weigh less than 50 lbs. and could be snapped in, or removed without tools. One, or both gasoline engine components could be used, and if both were used, the range of the car would be extended to several hundred miles. If the engine and gas tank were removed, more batteries would fit in their space. This would give maximum flexibility - a 100% plug-in electric car for routine commuting and short trips and a car that could occasionally be driven hundreds of miles. Best of all, the batteries would not need to carry along the dead weight of the engine and gas tank when there is no need for them.
- 2 votes
That's an interesting idea, but who can heft an engine except with some fancy machinery? How would I get it out, and where would I put it (I don't have a garage, simply a parking space in front of my townhouse)?
- 3 votes
Chrysler can't even build a normal car well, what makes them think they can get it right with electric. I have a 2008 Dodge Avenger that only has 36k miles on it and the motor blew up. Chrysler wouldn't back the motor because it was 900 miles over the warranty. No car should blow up with that few miles on it. Sounds like quality to me. I would stay away from Chrysler if I were car shopping. Just an opinion.
It would be interesting to hear from more Chrysler owners. Sounds like you got burned badly.
- 1 vote
Chrysler can't even get a normal vehicle right, what makes them think they can get electric right. I have a 2008 Dodge Avenger with 36k miles and the motor blew. Chrysler wouldn't back the motor because it was 900 mile over the warranty. There's quality and pride in your product right there. That shouldn't happen with any vehicle. I would not be looking at Chrysler if I was car shopping. Just one guys opinion.
OH AN ELECTRIC CAR IS GOOD FOR THE ENVIROMENT OR IS IT? LETS THINK ABOUT IT...YOU PLUG YOUR CAR INTO AN ELECTRIC OUTLET, SUCKING OUT LOTS OF ELECTRICITY, AND OU DO THAT DAILY. CAN SOMEONE PLEASE TELL CRYSLER TO DO MORE RESEARCH INTO ENVIROMENTALY FRIENDLY BEFORE PROCEDING TO PRODUCTION. WAY TO GO!
Depends on what's powering the electricity. I've agreed to pay for wind energy from my local electricity provider. Of course, it's all mixed together when I get the electricity, but as far as I'm concerned any electricity I'd use would be considered wind-generated. Much better than coal or gasoline for the environment, IMHO.
- 2 votes
visit my page for and indept article about "seemingly harmless" green technologies
I loved my Chrysler LeBaron convertible as only a 16 year old can love their first car however that thing was plagued with transmission problems and some other issues over the eight years I had it. For that last eight years I've had a Honda Accord that hasn't had any issues yet at all (knock on wood).
That said if Chrysler brought out a really intriguing electric I'd certainly consider it. At the moment I'm interesting in the Volt as my next car but still too early to say. I'd like to see a convertible electric by somebody!
- 4 votes
the volt is going to be a piece of crap- they had this same car in california back in 1995-96
same design same crappy engine- if you don't believe me check out the dvd
"who killed the electric car" which is available online or at your local library
don't remember this car, of course not because they only made a few hundred,didn't advertise
them at all,were only available in California and after they defeated an anti pollution law, took
them all back and put them in a car crusher- there is one left in a museum in Detroit,but even
then it's only a shell because they took out the engine before they allowed them to have
Remember knowledge is power
Knowledge and information are very different things. The circumstances surrounding the EV1 and all the subsequent speculation and conspiracy theories qualify as information but I think they fall short of the bar for knowledge.
What information has been released on the Chevy Volt is clearly not a reconstituted GM EV1. Once they are in production we will all have the opportunity to know this firsthand or alternatively have it proven true.
Regardless my personal plans include maintaining my Honda Accord for several more years and observe the performance of the Volt and it's competitors for at least two years post production and see what services like Consumer Reports has to say about them. Other reports indicate the first year model or two might be rather pricey until volume is high enough to bring it down. I'm not the type of person that needs to be first and stand out, I like new technology but when it's proven.
Ever notice how they always keep pushing the date out a couple more years. In 2006 they said we would have them by the end of 2008! hmm in 2007 they said it would be 2009, now in 2008 it's going to be near the end of 2010 and they don,t know exactly which one if any will really be put into production.
To Hell with the big oil controlled US Auto makers. I hope they all fail due to their greed and deceit.
I'm making my own conversion all electric car in my garage now. It will get over 100 miles with a 3 to 4 hour charge. Don't hold your breath for the big 3 to pulled kicking and screaming into this new technology!
- 2 votes
so chrysler can't build their electric cars unless they get a $25 billion bailout from the government
can you say BLACKMAIL
How's this, the government gives the big three the bailout, but all the top executives have to take
a 50% pay cut and turn in their stock options- sounds fair to me- they can get their money back when they start earning it
Nardell said in an interview that they tried to come out with an electric car in 1995-96 but nobody wanted it
Of course no one wanted it- they did every thing they could to crush it- they originally brought it out
because of a law that was passed in California,but they tried everything in their power to get that law
overturned which they eventually did
The advertising campaign they used was pathetic-the commercials were just horrible,basically
the opposite of every other car ad ever made. They leased the cars to people and when that law was defeated they took the cars away and crushed them all,despite the protests of nearly all the lessees
Check out the dvd "who killed the electric car" most libraries have a copy of it- though I doubt
you'll find one in Michigan. In it you'll find out that someone invented an electric engine that could
go up to 200 miles without a charge- the patent for that engine is now owned by an oil company!
so much for progress-- so when I hear they're coming out with an electric car, I take that with a large grain of salt
Chrysler Chief Executive Bob Nardelli said the technologies the company displayed Tuesday would be accelerated if Congress funds a $25 billion loan program to help automakers and their suppliers modernize their plants to make more fuel-efficient vehicles.
Sound worth it. If we can be assured that taxpayers and worker would get a deal. I could help Michigan. They could use it.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |



